Principal Commissioner Of Income Taxinternational Taxation Wardcoimbatore v. Muruganand Swarnamala48, West Ponnurangam Roadr.s.puram, Coimbatore – 641 002Pan: Agvps 9513 R
High Court
15 Oct 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Principal Commissioner Of Income Taxinternational Taxation Wardcoimbatore v. Muruganand Swarnamala48, West Ponnurangam Roadr.s.puram, Coimbatore – 641 002Pan: Agvps 9513 R
Date of order
15 Oct 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Principal Commissioner Of Income Taxinternational Taxation Wardcoimbatore v. Muruganand Swarnamala48, West Ponnurangam Roadr.s.puram, Coimbatore – 641 002Pan: Agvps 9513 R, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: Whether or not the Tribunal was right in not considering the basis aspect of taxation for capital gains is that it has to be paid in the year of transfer even though the actual consideration is received at a later point of time as contemplative in Sections 45 and 48 of Income Tax Act, 1961?" 2.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
T.C.A.No.63 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 15.10.2024
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R. SURESH KUMARAND
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN
T.C.A.No.63 of 2024
Principal Commissioner of Income TaxInternational Taxation WardCoimbatore...Appellant
Vs.
Muruganand Swarnamala48, West Ponnurangam RoadR.S.Puram, Coimbatore – 641 002PAN: AGVPS 9513 R...Respondent
Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras “C”Bench,Chennaidated31.07.2023passedin I.T.A.No.82/CHNY/2023.
For the Appellant:Mr.Karthik RanganathanSenior Standing Counsel
For the Respondent:Mr.A.S.Sivaraman
JUDGMENT
(Order of the Court was made by R.SURESH KUMAR, J.)The present tax case appeal was admitted on 22.03.2024 by
this Court on the following substantial questions of law:-
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
"1. Whether or not the Tribunal was right in not considering the basis aspect of taxation for capital gains is that it has to be paid in the year of transfer even though the actual consideration is received at a later point of time as contemplative in Sections 45 and 48 of Income Tax Act, 1961?"
2. It is submitted by the learned Senior Standing Counsel appearing for the appellant Revenue that this matter is covered under the Low Tax Effect as per the recent Circular dated 17.09.2024, in Circular No.9/2024.
3. Hence, this appeal stands dismissed, as covered under the low tax effect and the substantial question of law arising in this appeal is kept open to be decided at the later point of time. There shall be no order as to costs.
Neutral Citation:Yes/No
drm
T.C.A.No.63 of 2024
R. SURESH KUMAR, J.ANDC. SARAVANAN, J.
(drm)
T.C.A.No.63 of 2024
15.10.2024
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.