Principal Commissioner Of Income Taxmumbai v. Ruprit Agency Pvt. Ltd
High Court
03 Sep 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Principal Commissioner Of Income Taxmumbai v. Ruprit Agency Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
03 Sep 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Principal Commissioner Of Income Taxmumbai v. Ruprit Agency Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.
Decision: The appeal is disposed of as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
suresh
10-ITXA-307.2016.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.307 OF 2016
Principal Commissioner of Income TaxMumbai
Vs.
Ruprit Agency Pvt. Ltd.
.... Appellant
.... Respondent
Mr. Arvind Pinto for the Appellant.Mr. Balkrishna V. Jhaveri for the Respondent.
CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI &B.P. COLABAWALLA, JJ.
DATE : SEPTEMBER 03, 2018
P.C:
1.After the appeal was filed, now, Mr. Arvind Pinto,the arguing Advocate, has received instructions from theRevenue officials that bearing in mind the low tax effect, thisappeal deserves to be withdrawn. If the Revenue has instructedthe Counsel not to press this appeal but seek leave to withdrawit, then, we grant such leave by clarifying that the questionsproposed and stated to be of law, are kept open for decision in
Page 1 of 2
suresh
10-ITXA-307.2016.doc
an appropriate case. The appeal is disposed of as withdrawn.
2.Refund of Court fee as per rules.
(B.P. COLABAWALLA, J.) (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
Digitally signedSureshby SureshJagdishJagdishSajnawatDate:Sajnawat2018.09.0513:33:47 +0530
Page 2 of 2
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.