Principal Commissioner Of Income Taxno v. M/S. Hari Krishna Papers Pvt. Ltd
High Court
15 Oct 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Principal Commissioner Of Income Taxno v. M/S. Hari Krishna Papers Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
15 Oct 2024
Assessment year(s)
2010-11
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Principal Commissioner Of Income Taxno v. M/S. Hari Krishna Papers Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is justified in law by deciding the issue by over viewing the finding of the CIT(A) that the restrictive provisions under Section 80 IA(3)(ii) is also applicable?" 2.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 15.10.2024
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R. SURESH KUMARAND
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN
T.C.A.No.497 of 2019
Principal Commissioner of Income TaxNo.63, Race Course RoadCoimbatore...Appellant
Vs.
M/s. Hari Krishna Papers Pvt. Ltd.No.54/2, Jothi NagarVenkatesa Mills PostUdumalpet 642 128.PAN: AAD CS 0649 B
..Respondent
Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Madras Bench,Chennaidated15.02.2016passedin I.T.A.No.1190/Mds/2016.
For the Appellant:Mr.Karthik RanganathanSenior Standing Counsel
For the Respondent:
Mr.A.S.Sivaraman
JUDGMENT
(Order of the Court was made by R.SURESH KUMAR, J.)The substantial questions of law raised in this tax case
appeal are as follows:-
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
"1. Whether on the facts and circumstances of
the case, the Appellate Tribunal is justified in quashing the Revision order passed under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2010-11?
2. Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is justified in law in holding that a new industrial undertaking has come into existence within the meaning of sub Section (2) of Section 80IA of the Income Tax Act?
3. Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is legally correct by holding that the provisions of Section 80 IA(3)(i) is not applicable to the turbine unit?
4. Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is justified in law by deciding the issue by over viewing the finding of the CIT(A) that the restrictive provisions under Section 80 IA(3)(ii) is also applicable?"
2. It is submitted by the learned Senior Standing Counsel appearing for the appellant Revenue that this matter is covered under the Low Tax Effect as per the recent Circular dated 17.09.2024, in Circular No.9/2024.
T.C.A.No.497 of 2019
3. Hence, this appeal stands dismissed, as covered under the
low tax effect and the substantial questions of law raised in this appeal are kept open to be decided at the later point of time. There shall be no order as to costs.
(R.S.K., J.) (C.S.N, J) 15.10.2024
Neutral Citation:Yes/No
drm
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
T.C.A.No.497 of 2019
R. SURESH KUMAR, J.ANDC. SARAVANAN, J.(drm)
T.C.A.No.497 of 2019
15.10.2024
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.