Principal Commissioner Of Income Taxward 2(5), Erode v. T.senthil
High Court
15 Oct 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Principal Commissioner Of Income Taxward 2(5), Erode v. T.senthil
Date of order
15 Oct 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Principal Commissioner Of Income Taxward 2(5), Erode v. T.senthil, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the learned ITAT was justified in holding that a valid revised return can be filed on a return u/s 153A which ought to be considered by the Assessing Officer?" 2.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 15.10.2024
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R. SURESH KUMARAND
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN
T.C.A.No.83 of 2024
Principal Commissioner of Income TaxWard 2(5), Erode...Appellant
Vs.
T.Senthil
..Respondent
Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal “C” Bench,Chennaidated09.06.2023passedin I.T.A.No.1631/CHNY/2018.
For the Appellant:Mr.Karthik RanganathanSenior Standing Counsel
JUDGMENT
(Order of the Court was made by R.SURESH KUMAR, J.)The present tax case appeal was admitted on 04.06.2024 by
this Court on the following substantial question of law:-
"1. Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the learned ITAT was justified in holding that a valid revised return can be filed on a return u/s 153A which ought to be considered by the Assessing Officer?"
2. It is submitted by the learned Senior Standing Counsel appearing for the appellant Revenue that this matter is covered under the Low Tax Effect as per the recent Circular dated 17.09.2024, in Circular No.9/2024.
3. Hence, this appeal stands dismissed, as covered under the low tax effect and the substantial question of law arising in this appeal is kept open to be decided at the later point of time. There shall be no order as to costs.
Neutral Citation:Yes/No
drm
T.C.A.No.83 of 2024
R. SURESH KUMAR, J.ANDC. SARAVANAN, J.
(drm)
T.C.A.No.83 of 2024
15.10.2024
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.