Case LawHigh Court › Principal Commissioner Of Incometax-1, K...

Principal Commissioner Of Incometax-1, Kolkata v. Ebiw Info Analytics Private Limited

High Court 13 Jun 2022 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
Principal Commissioner Of Incometax-1, Kolkata v. Ebiw Info Analytics Private Limited
Date of order
13 Jun 2022
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Principal Commissioner Of Incometax-1, Kolkata v. Ebiw Info Analytics Private Limited, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Consequently, the appeal stands rejected.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
ITAT/123/2021IA No.GA/1/2021IA No.GA/2/2021 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTASpecial Jurisdiction (Income Tax)ORIGINAL SIDE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX-1, KOLKATA -Versus- EBIW INFO ANALYTICS PRIVATE LIMITED Appearance:Ms. Smita Das De, Adv....for the appellant. BEFORE: The Hon’ble JUSTICE T.S. SIVAGNANAM -And- The Hon’ble JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA Date : 13[th] June, 2022. The Court : Reference may be made to the order dated 1[st] April, 2022 which reads as follows: “We have heard Mr. Prithu Dudheria, learned standingcounsel appearing for the appellant/revenue. The Ministry of Law and Justice has sent a noticewith an incomplete address. This shows that the Departmenthas not even applied its mind while addressing the assessee,thereby causing inconvenience to the Court. We have beencompelled to adjourn the matter for more than threeoccasions. By way of last indulgence, let notice be servedto the correct address and affidavit of service be filed onthe next hearing date. List the matter on 10[th] June, 2022.” Despite opportunity being granted to the Ministry of Law& Justice to serve notice on the respondents, no steps have beentaken to serve notice. As indicated in the above order, on morethan three occasions the matter have been adjourned for service ofnotice on the respondents. However, no effective steps have beentaken by the Ministry. Further, we note that there is a delay of510 days in filing the appeal. We have perused the affidavit filed in support of theapplication for condonation of delay and we find that there is nosufficient cause shown by the department for condoning suchinordinate delay.For the above reasons, the application for condonation ofdelay is dismissed. Consequently, the appeal stands rejected. (HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA, J.) S.Das/As.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan