Principal Commissioner Of Incometax-1, Kolkata v. M/S. Macnally Bharat Engineeringltd
High Court
07 Jul 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
Principal Commissioner Of Incometax-1, Kolkata v. M/S. Macnally Bharat Engineeringltd
Date of order
07 Jul 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Principal Commissioner Of Incometax-1, Kolkata v. M/S. Macnally Bharat Engineeringltd, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
ITAT/109/2021IA No.GA/2/2021
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTASpecial Jurisdiction (Income Tax)ORIGINAL SIDE
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX-1, KOLKATA
-Versus-
M/S. MACNALLY BHARAT ENGINEERINGLTD.
Appearance:Ms. Smita Das Dey, Adv....for the appellant.Mr. A. K. Dey, Adv....for the respondent.
BEFORE:
The Hon’ble JUSTICE T.S. SIVAGNANAM
-And-
The Hon’ble JUSTICE BIVAS PATTANAYAK
Date : 7[th] July, 2022.The Court : This appeal filed by the revenue underSection 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the ‘Act’ for brevity)is directed against the order dated 22[nd] November, 2019 passed bythe Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” Bench, Kolkata in ITA Nos.147 & 109 & C.O. Nos. 35 & 36/Kol/2018 for the assessment years2010-11 and 2011-12.
We have heard Ms. Smita Das Dey, learned standing counselfor the appellant/revenue and Mr. A. K. Dey, learned Advocateappearing for the respondent.
Learned counsel appearing for the respondent submittedthat the respondent/company has gone into liquidation and theNational Company Law Tribunal, Kolkata Bench-I, Kolkata by itsorder passed in CP.(IB)No.891/KB/2020 dated 29[th] April, 2022 hasadmitted the petition filed under Section 7 of the Insolvency andBankruptcy Code read with 2016 Rules for initiating CIRP againstthe respondent/assessee. The operative portion of the orderpassed by the NCLT is contained in paragraph 13 therein.
In the light of the subsequent development, theappellant/revenue cannot proceed with the present appeal.Accordingly, the present appeal (ITAT/109/2021) stands disposed offor the aforementioned reasons and the substantial questions oflaw which have been raised by the revenue are left open.
Consequently, the connected application for stay (IANo.GA/2/2021) also stands closed.
(T.S. SIVAGNANAM, J.)
(BIVAS PATTANAYAK, J.)
As./S.Das.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.