Case LawHigh Court › Principal Commissioner Of Incometax-1, K...

Principal Commissioner Of Incometax-1, Kolkata v. M/S. Macnally Bharat Engineeringltd

High Court 07 Jul 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
Principal Commissioner Of Incometax-1, Kolkata v. M/S. Macnally Bharat Engineeringltd
Date of order
07 Jul 2022
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Principal Commissioner Of Incometax-1, Kolkata v. M/S. Macnally Bharat Engineeringltd, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
ITAT/109/2021IA No.GA/2/2021 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTASpecial Jurisdiction (Income Tax)ORIGINAL SIDE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX-1, KOLKATA -Versus- M/S. MACNALLY BHARAT ENGINEERINGLTD. Appearance:Ms. Smita Das Dey, Adv....for the appellant.Mr. A. K. Dey, Adv....for the respondent. BEFORE: The Hon’ble JUSTICE T.S. SIVAGNANAM -And- The Hon’ble JUSTICE BIVAS PATTANAYAK Date : 7[th] July, 2022.The Court : This appeal filed by the revenue underSection 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the ‘Act’ for brevity)is directed against the order dated 22[nd] November, 2019 passed bythe Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” Bench, Kolkata in ITA Nos.147 & 109 & C.O. Nos. 35 & 36/Kol/2018 for the assessment years2010-11 and 2011-12. We have heard Ms. Smita Das Dey, learned standing counselfor the appellant/revenue and Mr. A. K. Dey, learned Advocateappearing for the respondent. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent submittedthat the respondent/company has gone into liquidation and theNational Company Law Tribunal, Kolkata Bench-I, Kolkata by itsorder passed in CP.(IB)No.891/KB/2020 dated 29[th] April, 2022 hasadmitted the petition filed under Section 7 of the Insolvency andBankruptcy Code read with 2016 Rules for initiating CIRP againstthe respondent/assessee. The operative portion of the orderpassed by the NCLT is contained in paragraph 13 therein. In the light of the subsequent development, theappellant/revenue cannot proceed with the present appeal.Accordingly, the present appeal (ITAT/109/2021) stands disposed offor the aforementioned reasons and the substantial questions oflaw which have been raised by the revenue are left open. Consequently, the connected application for stay (IANo.GA/2/2021) also stands closed. (T.S. SIVAGNANAM, J.) (BIVAS PATTANAYAK, J.) As./S.Das.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan