Principal Commissioner Of Incometax-5, Kolkata v. Anju Devi Patwari
High Court
07 Jul 2022 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
Principal Commissioner Of Incometax-5, Kolkata v. Anju Devi Patwari
Date of order
07 Jul 2022
Assessment year(s)
2014-15
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Principal Commissioner Of Incometax-5, Kolkata v. Anju Devi Patwari, the High Court (2022) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Swati Bajaj & Ors. reported in 2022 SCC Online Cal 1572 and the appeals filed by the revenue were allowed.Following the said decision, this appeal stands allowed and thequestions of law are answered in favour of the revenue.The connected application for stay (IA No.GA/2/2021) alsostands disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
ITAT/105/2021IA No.GA/2/2021
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTASpecial Jurisdiction (Income Tax)
ORIGINAL SIDE
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX-5, KOLKATA
-Versus-
ANJU DEVI PATWARI
Appearance:Mr. Soumen Bhattacharyya, Adv....for the appellant.
BEFORE:
The Hon’ble JUSTICE T.S. SIVAGNANAM
-And-
The Hon’ble JUSTICE BIVAS PATTANAYAK
The Court : This appeal filed by the revenue underSection 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the ‘Act’ for brevity)is directed against the order dated 26[th] June, 2019 passed by theIncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Kolkata Bench, “SMC” Kolkata in ITANo. 1825/Kol/2018 for the assessment year 2014-15.
We have heard Mr. Soumen Bhattacharyya, learned standingcounsel for the appellant/revenue.
Though notice has been served upon the respondents, noneappears for the respondent. It is not in dispute that thequestions of law raised in this appeal were considered in a batchof cases in PCIT vs. Swati Bajaj & Ors. reported in 2022 SCC
Online Cal 1572 and the appeals filed by the revenue were allowed.Following the said decision, this appeal stands allowed and thequestions of law are answered in favour of the revenue.The connected application for stay (IA No.GA/2/2021) alsostands disposed of.
(T.S. SIVAGNANAM, J.)
(BIVAS PATTANAYAK, J.)
As./S.Das.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.