Case LawHigh Court › Principal Commissioner Of Incometax, Cen...

Principal Commissioner Of Incometax, Central-1, Kolkata v. M/S. Ambica Capital Markets Limited

High Court 07 Dec 2021 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
Principal Commissioner Of Incometax, Central-1, Kolkata v. M/S. Ambica Capital Markets Limited
Date of order
07 Dec 2021
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Principal Commissioner Of Incometax, Central-1, Kolkata v. M/S. Ambica Capital Markets Limited, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

OD-22 ITAT/203/2018IA No.GA/2/2018 (Old No.GA/1628/2018) IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTASpecial Jurisdiction (Income Tax)ORIGINAL SIDE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX, CENTRAL-1, KOLKATA -Versus- M/S. AMBICA CAPITAL MARKETS LIMITED Appearance:Mr. P. K. Bhowmick, Adv....for the appellant. Mr. Malay Dhar, Adv.Mr. Bhaskar Sengupta, Adv....for the respondent. BEFORE: The Hon’ble JUSTICE T.S. SIVAGNANAM -And- The Hon’ble JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA Date : 7[th] December, 2021. The Court : The appeal filed by the revenue under Section260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the ‘Act’ in brevity) isdirected against the order dated 30[th] August, 2017 passed in ITANo.865-866/Kol/2017 by Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” Bench,Kolkata for the assessment years 2009-10 and 2010-11. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant/revenue aswell as learned counsel appearing for the respondent/assessee submitted that the tax effect involved in this appeals are lessthan the threshold limit fixed under the circular issued by theCentral Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT). If such is the undisputed factual position, the revenuecannot pursue the appeal. Accordingly, the appeals are dismissedon the ground of law tax effect and the substantial questions oflaw are left open. The connected application for stay (IA No.GA/2/2018) alsostands closed. (T.S. SIVAGNANAM, J.) (HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan