Principal Commissioner Of Incometax, Kolkata-4, Kolkata v. M/S. Anand Nirman Pvt. Ltd
High Court
In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
Principal Commissioner Of Incometax, Kolkata-4, Kolkata v. M/S. Anand Nirman Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
—
Assessment year(s)
2008-09
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Principal Commissioner Of Incometax, Kolkata-4, Kolkata v. M/S. Anand Nirman Pvt. Ltd, the High Court dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Therefore, in terms of thesaid order, this appeal stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
OD-28
ITAT/313/2018
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
Special Jurisdiction (Income Tax)ORIGINAL SIDE
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX, KOLKATA-4, KOLKATA
-Versus-
M/S. ANAND NIRMAN PVT. LTD.
Appearance:Mr. Tilak Mitra, Adv....for the appellant.
Mr. J. P. Khaitan, Sr. Adv.Mr. Asim Chowdhury, Adv.Mr. Soham Sen, Adv....for the respondent.
BEFORE:
The Hon’ble JUSTICE T.S. SIVAGNANAM
-And-
The Hon’ble JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA
Date : 7[th] March, 2022.
The Court : This appeal by the revenue filed underSection 260A of the Income Tax, 1961 (the ‘Act’ in brevity) isdirected against the order dated 12[th] July, 2017 passed by theIncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” Bench, Kolkata (in short the‘Tribunal’) in ITA No.808/Kol/2013 for the assessment year 2008-09.
From the order sheet we find that this appeal wasdismissed by the Division Bench by judgment and order dated 25[th]February, 2019 on the ground that no substantial questions of
law are involved in this appeal. Therefore, in terms of thesaid order, this appeal stands dismissed.
(T.S. SIVAGNANAM, J.)
(HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA, J.)
As/RS
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue