Case LawHigh Court › Principal Commissioner Of Incometax, Kol...

Principal Commissioner Of Incometax, Kolkata-Ii, Kolkata v. M/S. Tea Time Limited

High Court 15 Jul 2022 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
Principal Commissioner Of Incometax, Kolkata-Ii, Kolkata v. M/S. Tea Time Limited
Date of order
15 Jul 2022
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Principal Commissioner Of Incometax, Kolkata-Ii, Kolkata v. M/S. Tea Time Limited, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Accordingly, the appeal filed by the revenue (ITAT/197/2016) stands dismissed on the ground of low tax effectand the substantial questions of law are left open.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
OD-10 ITAT/197/2016 IA No.GA/1/2016 (Old No.GA/1608/2016) IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTASpecial Jurisdiction (Income Tax)ORIGINAL SIDE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX, KOLKATA-II, KOLKATA -Versus- M/S. TEA TIME LIMITED Appearance:Mr. Prithu Dudheria, Adv....for the appellant.Mr. J. P. Khaitan, Sr. Adv.Mr. Siddhartha Das, Adv.Ms. Swapna Das, Adv....for the respondent. BEFORE: The Hon’ble JUSTICE T.S. SIVAGNANAM -And- The Hon’ble JUSTICE BIVAS PATTANAYAK Date : 15[th] July, 2022. The Court : This appeal filed by the revenue underSection 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the ‘Act’ for brevity)is directed against the order dated 20[th] November, 2015 passed bythe Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Kolkata, “C” Bench, Kolkata inITA Nos.1382 & 1383/Kol/2009 for the assessment years 2002-03 and2003-04.We have heard Mr. Prithu Dudheria, learned standingcounsel for the appellant/revenue and Mr. J. P. Khaitan, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. Siddhartha Das and Ms. Swapna Das,learned Advocates for the respondent. The learned counsel appearing for the appellant submittedthat the tax effect involved in this appeal is lesser than thethreshold limit fixed by the CBDT and, consequently, the revenuecannot pursue the matter. Accordingly, the appeal filed by the revenue (ITAT/197/2016) stands dismissed on the ground of low tax effectand the substantial questions of law are left open. Consequently, the connected application for stay (IANo.GA/1/2016) also stands closed. (T.S. SIVAGNANAM, J.) (BIVAS PATTANAYAK, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan