Case LawHigh Court › Principal Commissioner Ofincome Tax-5, K...

Principal Commissioner Ofincome Tax-5, Kolkata v. Bhagyalaxmi Conclave Pvt. Ltd

High Court 06 Dec 2022 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
Principal Commissioner Ofincome Tax-5, Kolkata v. Bhagyalaxmi Conclave Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
06 Dec 2022
Assessment year(s)
2012-13
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Principal Commissioner Ofincome Tax-5, Kolkata v. Bhagyalaxmi Conclave Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

O-53 ITAT/221/2022GA/2/2022 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTASpecial Jurisdiction [Income Tax]ORIGINAL SIDE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX-5, KOLKATA -Versus- BHAGYALAXMI CONCLAVE PVT. LTD. Appearance:Mr. Soumen Bhattacharya, Adv....for the appellant.Mtr. Jawed Ahmed Khan, Adv.Mr. Talha Ahmed, Adv.Mr. Bhaskar Sengupta, Adv... . for the respondent. BEFORE: The Hon’ble JUSTICE T.S. SIVAGNANAM -And- The Hon’ble JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA Date : 6[th] December, 2022. The Court : This appeal filed by the revenue underSection 260A of the Income Tax Act, is directed against theorder dated 3[rd] February, 2021 passed by the Income TaxAppellate Tribunal, “B” Bench, Kolkata (the Tribunal) in ITANo.2517/Kol/2019 for the assessment year 2012-13. The revenue has suggested the following substantialquestions of law for consideration: We have heard Mr. Prithu Dudheria, learned standingcounsel for the appellant/revenue and Mr. Jawed Ahmed Khan,learned counsel assisted by Mr. Talha Ahmed and Mr. BhaskarSengupta, learned Advocates for the respondent/assessee. The short question involved in the instant case iswhether the notice required to be issued under Section 143(2)was issued. The Tribunal has referred to a remand reportsubmitted by the Assessing Officer wherein the Department couldnot controvert the contention made by the assessee that nonotice under Section 143(2) of the Act was issued by the DeputyCommissioner of Income Tax, Circle-13(1), Kolkata who completedthe assessment. Further, the Tribunal has also noted therelevant decisions and rightly held that the assessment orderis bad in law for the reason that the Assessing Officer passedthe order under Section 143(2) of the Act without issuing anynotice 143(2). We find that there is no substantial question oflaw arising for consideration in this appeal.Accordingly, the appeal fails and isdismissed. Consequently, the connected application stands closed. (T.S. SIVAGNANAM, J.) (HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan