Case LawHigh Court › Principal Commissionere Of Income Tax, F...

Principal Commissionere Of Income Tax, Faridabad v. M/S Fcc Clutch India Pvt. Ltd

High Court 24 Apr 2023 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Principal Commissionere Of Income Tax, Faridabad v. M/S Fcc Clutch India Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
24 Apr 2023
Assessment year(s)
2014-15
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Principal Commissionere Of Income Tax, Faridabad v. M/S Fcc Clutch India Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: (RITU BAHRI) JUDGE 24.04.2023 Jyoti-IV Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 237-5 ITA No.196 of 2022 Date of decision: 24.04.2023 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONERE OF INCOME TAX, FARIDABAD …. Appellant Versus M/S FCC CLUTCH INDIA PVT. LTD. …. Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present : **** RITU BAHRI, J. (oral) This appeal has been filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench ‘B’ dated 30.07.2021 passed in ITA No.1503/Del/2019 for the assessment year 2014-15. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that in the present case, the impugned assessment order dated 20.12.2016 (Annexure A-1) has been passed by the Assessing Officer at Delhi and this Court has no jurisdiction to entertain this appeal as per the judgment passed by the Supreme Court in case titled as Principal Commissioner of Income Tax vs. ABC Papers Ltd., (2022) 447 ITR 1 SC. Learned counsel for the appellant is not able to dispute this fact and she seeks permission to withdraw this appeal with liberty to file the appeal before the competent jurisdiction, in accordance with law. Dismissed as withdrawn. (RITU BAHRI) JUDGE 24.04.2023 Jyoti-IV Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No. Whether reportable : Yes/No (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan