Case Law › High Court › Principal Commissionerof Income Tax,Delh...

Principal Commissionerof Income Tax,Delhi-2 v. Principal Commissionerof Income Tax,Delhi-2

High Court 18 Aug 2017 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · dhcdb

Parties

Date of order

18 Aug 2017

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In Principal Commissionerof Income Tax,Delhi-2 v. Principal Commissionerof Income Tax,Delhi-2, the High Court (2017) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

$~ *IN THE HIGH COURTOF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+W.P. (C) No. 7019/2017 61 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONEROF INCOME TAX,DELHI-2 Petitioner Through:Mr. Rahul Kaushik, Senior standingcounsel. versus BOSE CORPORATION INDIA PVT. LTDRespondent AND 92 +W.P.(C) No. 7110/2017 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONEROF INCOME TAX,DELHI-2....Petitioner Through:Mr. RahulKaushik,Seniorstandingcounsel. versus CASIO I>JDIACO. PRIVATE LTD Respondent CORAM:JUSTICE S. MURALIDHARJUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH ORDERo/p18.08.2017C.M. No. 29143/2017 (exemption^ in W.P.No. 7019/2017C.M. No. 29520/2017 (exemption^ in W.P. (C) No. 7110/2017 1. Allowedsubjectto alljust exceptions. W.P. fO No. 7019/2017 & CM. No. 29142/2017 (stay)W.P. (C) No. 7110/2017 & CM. No. 29519/2017 (stay) 2. In view of the decisionof this Court Ltd. v. Assistant in Pepsi Foods P.CommissionerofIncomeTax [2015]376ITR87 (Del),the questionraiseddoesnot survive.The petitionsandthe pendingapplicationsare disposedof. S. MUKALIDHAR, J. AUGUST 18, 2017 Rm PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J.

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.