Principal Commissionerofincometax(Central)-1 v. Vijay Kumar Katariathrough
High Court
24 Jul 2017 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Principal Commissionerofincometax(Central)-1 v. Vijay Kumar Katariathrough
Date of order
24 Jul 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Principal Commissionerofincometax(Central)-1 v. Vijay Kumar Katariathrough, the High Court (2017) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
•(r
$~1 to 4*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ITA 462/2017
ITA 463/2017ITA 464/2017ITA 465/2017
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONEROFINCOMETAX(CENTRAL)-1
Appellant
Through:Mr. ZohebHossain,SeniorStandingCounsel for Revenue.
Versus
VIJAY KUMAR KATARIAThrough:
Respondent
CORAM:JUSTICE S.MURALIDHARJUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH
ORDER%24.07.2017
CM APPL. 22488/2017 (Exemption^in ITA 463/2017CM APPL. 22490/2017 (Exemption)in ITA 464/2017CM APPL. 22492/2017 (Exemption)in ITA 465/2017
1.Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
CM APPL. 22487/2017 (Delay in filing) in ITA 462/2017CM APPL. 22489/2017 (Delay in filing) in ITA 463/2017CM APPL. 22491/2017 (Delay in filing) in ITA 464/2017CM APPL. 22493/2017 (Delay in filing) in ITA 465/2017
2. For the reasons stated in these applications,the delay in filing theseappealsis condonedandthe applicationsstanddisposedof.
ITA Nos. 462/2017. 463/2017.464/2017. 465/2017
3. These connectedappealsby the Revenueare directedagainsta commonorder dated 6^^ December, 2016 for the Assessment Years (AYs) 2004-05,2005-06, 2007-08 and 2006-07.
4. In view of the order dated 25^ April, 2016 in ITA No. 263/2016 etc.whereinthe appealsofthe Revenuefor these very AYs hav^ alreadybeendismissedby this Court,theseappealsare also dismissed.
S.MURALIDHAR,J
JULY 24,2017
PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.