Case LawHigh Court › Principalcommissionerof Income-Tax(Centr...

Principalcommissionerof Income-Tax(Central)-1 v. M/S Ruchikatreximltd

High Court 01 May 2017 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Principalcommissionerof Income-Tax(Central)-1 v. M/S Ruchikatreximltd
Date of order
01 May 2017
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Principalcommissionerof Income-Tax(Central)-1 v. M/S Ruchikatreximltd, the High Court (2017) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: The appeals are dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

(\ o $-2 & 5 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI +ITA 256/2017 PRINCIPALCOMMISSIONEROF INCOME-TAX(CENTRAL)-1 Appellant Through:Mr. Sanjay Kumar & Mr. DileepShivpuri, Advocates versus M/S RUCHIKATREXIMLTD. Respondent Through:Mr. Shashwat Bajpai & Mr. SharadAgarwal, Advocates WITH + ^Pr^75/2017 PRINCIPALCOMMISSIONEROF INCOME-TAX(CENTRAL)-1 AppellantThrough:Mr. Sanjay Kumar & Mr. DileepShivpuri, Advocates versus M/S RUCHIKATREXIMLTD. Respondent Through:None CORAM:JUSTICE S.MURALIDHARJUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHARORDER%01.05.2017 CM No.14163/2017in ITA No.275/2017 1.Allowed,subjectto alljust exceptions. ITA Nos.256/2017& 275/2017 2. The questionraised in these appeals by the Revenue againstthe orderdated 31'' October, 2016 in ITA No.3675/Del/2012of the Income TaxAppellateTribunalfor AssessmentYear 2006-07stands coveredagainstitby the decisionofthis Courtin CITv. KabulChawla380ITR 573 and theorder datedApril, 2017 in ITA No. 228 of 2017 {PrincipalCommissionerofIncomeTax(Central)-Iv. DevenderKumarAggarwal). 3. The appeals are dismissed. S.MURALIDHAR,J MAY 01, 2017tp chanb^:rshekhar,j
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan