Case Law › High Court › Prism Scan Express Private Limited, Than...

Prism Scan Express Private Limited, Thane v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Mumbai…

High Court 29 Apr 2024 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newas

Parties

Date of order

29 Apr 2024

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In Prism Scan Express Private Limited, Thane v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Mumbai…, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.

Decision: 4.First Appeal stands disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Digitallysigned byTALLETALLESHUBHAMSHUBHAMASHOKRAOASHOKRAODate:2024.04.3019:35:15+0530 1 28-FA(ST)-10480-2024.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYCIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 10480 OF 2024WITHINTERIM APPLICATION NO. 8266 OF 2024WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 8267 OF 2024IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 10480 OF 2024 Prism Scan Express Private Limited, Thane … Appellant Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Mumbai… Respondents ---------------- Adv. Jay Bhansali, for the Appellant.Ms. Sushma Nagraj and Ms. Mansi. B, for the Respondents. ----------------- CORAM : KISHORE C. SANT, J. DATE : 29[th] APRIL, 2024 P.C.:- 1.The learned Advocate for the Applicant informs that theAppellant has already moved the Court of Deputy Commissioner of Income-Tax, Benami by filing her review. 2.In view of the same, he seeks leave to withdraw the Appeal.Leave granted. 3.Needless to say that the Appellant is at liberty to proceed withthe review. It is always Report for the Appellant to oppose this Court inReview Application is decided against him. 4.First Appeal stands disposed of. 5.Pending Applications, if any, stand disposed of. (KISHORE C. SANT, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.