Priya Soparkar v. D.chetan & Co. (Income Taxappeal
High Court
14 Jan 2019 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Priya Soparkar v. D.chetan & Co. (Income Taxappeal
Date of order
14 Jan 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Priya Soparkar v. D.chetan & Co. (Income Taxappeal, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: 4.In the result, Tax Appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
Priya Soparkar
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.915 OF 2016
Pr.Commissioner of Income Tax-19
… Appellant
V/s.
M/s Polar Star… Respondent
---
Mr.Ashok Kotangle with Ms.Padma Divakar with Ms.KashmiraMhatre for the Appellant.Mr.S.J.Mehta for the Respondent.
---
CORAM : AKIL KURESHI AND
M.S.SANKLECHA, JJ.
DATE : JANUARY 14, 2019.
P.C.:-
1.Revenue has filed this appeal against the judgment ofIncome Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 5[th] August, 2015 raisingfollowing question for our consideration:
“Whether on the facts and in the circumstances ofthe case and in Law, the Tribunal was justified inallowing “Mark to Market” loss ofRs.6,11,76,098/- arising on valuation of forwardexchange contracts on the closing date ofaccounting year?”
Priya Soparkar
3. Learned counsel for the revenue fairly pointed out thatsuch a question was raised by the revenue in case of the assesseein Income Tax Appeal No.843 of 2016. The appeal was dismissedby an order dated 11[th] December, 2018 relying upon the decisionof this court in case of CIT Vs. D.Chetan & Co. (Income TaxAppeal No. 278 of 2014) dated 1[st] October, 2016.
4.In the result, Tax Appeal is dismissed.
(M.S.SANKLECHA,J.) (AKIL KURESHI,J.)….
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.