Case LawHigh Court › Priya Soparkar v. D.chetan & Co. (Income...

Priya Soparkar v. D.chetan & Co. (Income Taxappeal

High Court 14 Jan 2019 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Priya Soparkar v. D.chetan & Co. (Income Taxappeal
Date of order
14 Jan 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Priya Soparkar v. D.chetan & Co. (Income Taxappeal, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: 4.In the result, Tax Appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Priya Soparkar 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.915 OF 2016 Pr.Commissioner of Income Tax-19 … Appellant V/s. M/s Polar Star… Respondent --- Mr.Ashok Kotangle with Ms.Padma Divakar with Ms.KashmiraMhatre for the Appellant.Mr.S.J.Mehta for the Respondent. --- CORAM : AKIL KURESHI AND M.S.SANKLECHA, JJ. DATE : JANUARY 14, 2019. P.C.:- 1.Revenue has filed this appeal against the judgment ofIncome Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 5[th] August, 2015 raisingfollowing question for our consideration: “Whether on the facts and in the circumstances ofthe case and in Law, the Tribunal was justified inallowing “Mark to Market” loss ofRs.6,11,76,098/- arising on valuation of forwardexchange contracts on the closing date ofaccounting year?” Priya Soparkar 3. Learned counsel for the revenue fairly pointed out thatsuch a question was raised by the revenue in case of the assesseein Income Tax Appeal No.843 of 2016. The appeal was dismissedby an order dated 11[th] December, 2018 relying upon the decisionof this court in case of CIT Vs. D.Chetan & Co. (Income TaxAppeal No. 278 of 2014) dated 1[st] October, 2016. 4.In the result, Tax Appeal is dismissed. (M.S.SANKLECHA,J.) (AKIL KURESHI,J.)….
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan