Priyanka Batra v. The State Of Rajasthan
High Court
10 Aug 2017 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Priyanka Batra v. The State Of Rajasthan
Date of order
10 Aug 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Priyanka Batra v. The State Of Rajasthan, the High Court (2017) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FORRAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. CR. MISC. PETITION NO.2096/2010.
Priyanka Batra W/o Shri Vivek Batra, aged 36 years,Presently residing at B-22, Income Tax Colony, PedderRoad, Mumbai (Maharashtra)
Versus
1.The State of Rajasthan through its Poblic Prosecutor.
2. Sandeep Grover son of Shri R.K. Grover, Resident ofTower-GH-2, Apartment-9A, Orchid Gardens, Sun City,Sector-54, Gurgaon-122002
For Petitioner(s) : Shri V.R. Bajwa
For State : Shri R.R. Gurjar
For Respondent(s) : Shri J.P. Goyal, Sr. Advocate with Shri Dheeraj Singhal
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA
Order
10/8/2017
Learned counsel for the petitioner hassubmitted that after thorough investigation of thecase negative final report was submitted by theinvestigating agency. However, petitioner is readyto surrender before the trial court. Petitionerbepermitted to withdraw the petition to enable her totake all the pleas available to her before the trialcourt.
Ordered accordingly.
However, in case petitioner surrenders beforethe trial court within 15 days from today, she bereleased on bail subject to the satisfaction of the
trial court. Record of the trial court be sent backforthwith.
(SABINA)J.
Mrg.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.