Case LawHigh Court › Priyanka Jain v. Income Tax Officer, War...

Priyanka Jain v. Income Tax Officer, Ward-43 (1), Kolkata & Ors

High Court 17 Aug 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_appellate_side
Parties
Priyanka Jain v. Income Tax Officer, Ward-43 (1), Kolkata & Ors
Date of order
17 Aug 2022
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Priyanka Jain v. Income Tax Officer, Ward-43 (1), Kolkata & Ors, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

17.8.2022 ks sl. 4 ks WPA 9140 of 2022 Priyanka Jain VsIncome Tax Officer, Ward-43 (1), Kolkata & Ors. Mr. Rajarshi Chatterjee … For the Petitioner.Mrs. Smita Das De … For the Respondents. Heard learned Advocates appearing for the parties. By this writ petition, petitioner has challenged theimpugned order dated 26[th] March, 2022, underSection 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on theground that the same was passed ex parte bydisregarding and ignoring his application foradjournment dated 22nd March, 2022. The aforesaidimpugned order dated 26[th] March, 2022, was passedwithout considering the petitioner’s application foradjournment and as a result petitioner could not availthe opportunity of hearing, which is in violation ofprinciple of natural justice. In the interest of justice, this writ petition beingWPA 9140 of 2022 is disposed of by setting aside theaforesaid impugned order dated 26[th] March, 2022 andthe matter is remanded back to the Assessing Officerconcerned to pass a fresh speaking order inaccordance with law after giving an opportunity ofhearing to the petitioner or his authorised representative within four weeks from the date ofcommunication of this order. ( Md. Nizamuddin, J. )
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan