Case Law › High Court › Proctor And Gamble Home Products Ltd.… v...

Proctor And Gamble Home Products Ltd.… v. The Joint Commissioner

High Court 19 Mar 2021 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

19 Mar 2021

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Proctor And Gamble Home Products Ltd.… v. The Joint Commissioner, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.

Decision: The income tax appeal is disposed of asDigitallysigned byVinayak P.VinayakHalemathwithdrawn.P.Date:Halemath2021.03.2014:10:03+05302.Refund of Court-Fees as per rules.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

VPH IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL No. 2038 OF 2011 Proctor and Gamble Home Products Ltd.… Appellant Vs.The Joint Commissioner of Income Tax …Respondent *** Mr. Balasaheb Yewale i/b Rajesh Shah & Co., for the Appellant.Mr. Suresh Kumar, for the Respondent. *** CORAM:S. P. DESHMUKH &ABHAY AHUJA, JJ. DATE : MARCH 19, 2021 PC : 1.The learned counsel appearing for the Appellant, oninstructions, seeks leave to withdraw the appeal. The learned counsel appearing for the Revenue has no particular objection.Leave is granted. The income tax appeal is disposed of asDigitallysigned byVinayak P.VinayakHalemathwithdrawn.P.Date:Halemath2021.03.2014:10:03+05302.Refund of Court-Fees as per rules. 2.Refund of Court-Fees as per rules. Vinayak Halemath Sd/- Sd/- [ABHAY AHUJA, J.] [S. P. DESHMUKH, J.]

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.