Income Tax Case
High Court
05 Nov 2015 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
— v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Karnal (Haryana
Date of order
05 Nov 2015
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Karnal (Haryana, the High Court (2015) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?2.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH
ITA No.68 of 2015 (O&M)Date of decision: 5.11.2015
Sushil Kumar, Proprietor Atma Ram Sushil Kumar, 46, New GrainMarket, Kurukshetra (Haryana).
.....- Appe
Commissioner of Income lax, Karnal (Haryana)
....mesponden
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTALHON’ BLE MR. JUSTICE HARI PAL VERMA
1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?3. Whether the judgment should be reported 1n the Digest?
Present: Mr. Divya Suri, Advocate and Mr. Sachin Bhardwaj, Advocatefor the appellant-assessee.
Mr. Yogesh Putney, Advocate for the revenue.
Ajay Kumar Mittal,J,
For orders, see ITA No.60 of 2015 |Neme Kumar Jain,
Proprietor Mahavir Trading Co., New Grain Market, Kurukshetra(Haryana) vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, Karnal (Haryana)|.
(Ajay Kumar Mittal)Judge
November 05, 2015@=&@
(Har! Pal Verma)Judge —
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue