In Proviso Builders And Developers v. Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax Central, the High Court (2023) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYAPPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 11915 OF 2022
Proviso Builders And Developers
....PETITIONER
V/S
Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax Central....RESPONDENTCircle 4 And Ors
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 10013 OF 2022
N G Group....PETITIONER
V/S
Income Tax Officer Ward 28(2)(1) And Anr ....RESPONDENT
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 10534 OF 2022
Rahul Shravankumar Bagaria Lhr Late....PETITIONERShravankumar Bagaria
V/S
Assi. Commissioner Of Income Tax And Ors....RESPONDENT
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 11123 OF 2022
Vijay Ravji Gajra....PETITIONER
V/S
Income Tax Officer Ward 28(3) Mumbai And....RESPONDENTOrs
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 12312 OF 2022
Vijay Ravji Gajra
V/S
Income Tax Officer Ward 28(3) And Ors
....PETITIONER
....RESPONDENT
Ms. Ritika Agarwal a/w Ms. Rachna Bhanushali a/w Mr.Sandesh P. Salunkhe i/b Acelegal for PetitionerMr. Suresh Kumar for Respondent
WP/11915/2022 Wrongly on Board.
Other Matters i. e. WP/10013/2022 a/w 10534/2022 a/wWP/11123/2022 & WP/12312/2022.
CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE K.R. SHRIRAM &
HON'BLE JUSTICE DR. NEELA KEDARGOKHALE, JJDATE : 15th September, 2023
P.C. :
S. O. to 25/09/2023 .
( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.