Case LawHigh Court › Pune 411 037 v. Shri Dnyaneshwar Sahakar...

Pune 411 037 v. Shri Dnyaneshwar Sahakari

High Court 09 Feb 2009 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Pune 411 037 v. Shri Dnyaneshwar Sahakari
Date of order
09 Feb 2009
Assessment year(s)
1992-93
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Pune 411 037 v. Shri Dnyaneshwar Sahakari, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal.

Issue: Whether in view of the facts and in the circumstances of the case the ITAT was right in law in deleting the addition of Rs.36,85,57,330/- on account of excess cane price paid relying on the ITAT, Special Bench, Mumbai’s decision in the case of Manjara SSK Ltd. in ITA No.

Decision: In view of this appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1 MSS IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME-TAX APPEAL NO. 711 OF 2007 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I B-WING, PMT BLDG., SSWARGATE PUNE 411 037. .. APPELLANT Vs. SHRI DNYANESHWAR SAHAKARI SAKHAR KARKHANA LTD., AHMEDNAGAR. RESPONDENT Mr. Vimal Gupta for Appellant CORAM:SMT.RANJANA DESAI & J. P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATE: 9/2/2009 P.C. . Following substantial question of law is raised in this appeal: a. Whether in view of the facts and in the circumstances of the case the ITAT was right in law in deleting the addition of Rs.36,85,57,330/- on account of excess cane price paid relying on the ITAT, Special Bench, Mumbai’s decision in the case of Manjara SSK Ltd. in ITA No. 647/PN/1996 for A.Y. 1992-93, 91 ITD 361 (Mum) (S.B.) even when the decision has not been accepted by the Department and appeals has been filed before the 2 Hon’ble High Court? 2. The question raised in this appeal is answered by the decision of this court in C.I.T. v. Manjra Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd., 301 ITR 191 and is decided against the revenue. In view of this appeal is dismissed. JUDGE JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan