Pune v. Be-Delft Electronics Pvt. Ltd
High Court
08 Sep 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Pune v. Be-Delft Electronics Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
08 Sep 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Pune v. Be-Delft Electronics Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 428 OF 2007
The Commissioner of Income Tax-V,Pune...
Pune... ...........Appellant.VersusBe-Delft Electronics Pvt. Ltd. ...........Respondent.
Mr. Vimal Gupta for the Appellant.Mr. S. N. Inamdar for the Respondent.
P.C.:
CORAM :BILAL NAZKIandA. A. KUMBHAKONI, JJ.DATED :8TH SEPTEMBER, 2008.
It is conceded at the Bar that before filing the appeal permission wasneeded to be taken from the Committee of Disputes, which admittedly is notobtained. The respondent also had obtained such permission before it filedthe appeal in which it succeeded before the Tribunal. As such the appeal isdismissed.
2.However, the appellant is at liberty to approach this Court afresh, if hegets permission from the Committee of Disputes.
(BILAL NAZKI, J.)
Sd/-
(A. A. KUMBHAKONI, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue