Case Law › High Court › Pune v. None Present

Pune v. None Present

High Court 14 Aug 2007 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

14 Aug 2007

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Pune v. None Present, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal.

Decision: Appeal is dismissed for non prosecution.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 744 OF 2004 The Commissioner of Income Tax .... Appellant Pune Vs. Smt. Kusum R. Mota .... Respondent None present. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO, & CORAM : F.I. REBELLO, & CORAM : F.I. REBELLO, & . J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ . J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ . J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ DATE : 14TH AUGUST, 2007 DATE : 14TH AUGUST, 2007 P.C. . None present, when the matter is called out. Appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)( F.I. REBELLO, J.) ( F.I. REBELLO, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.