Punjab Tractors Ltd. Sas, Nagar, Mohali.… v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Patiala And Another
High Court
03 Feb 2017 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Punjab Tractors Ltd. Sas, Nagar, Mohali.… v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Patiala And Another
Date of order
03 Feb 2017
Assessment year(s)
2009-10
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Punjab Tractors Ltd. Sas, Nagar, Mohali.… v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Patiala And Another, the High Court (2017) decided the matter.
Decision: Accordingly this appeal is disposed of in the same terms as ITA No.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
��������������������������������������� DATE OF DECISION: 3rd February,2017
Punjab Tractors Ltd. SAS, Nagar, Mohali.…..Appellant
versus
Commissioner of Income Tax, Patiala and another ...Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.J. VAZIFDAR, CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL, JUDGE.
Present: Mrs.Radhika Suri, Senior Advocate with
Ms. Rinku Dahiya, Advocate, and Mr. Manpreet Singh, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr. Zora Singh Klar, Advocate,for the respondents.
..
S.J.VAZIFDAR,CHIEFJUSTICE:
This is an appeal against the order of the Income Tax
Appellate Tribunal in respect of a rectification application filed
by the assessee. The matter pertains to the assessment year 2009-10. The main appeal against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal is Income Tax Appeal No. 461 of 2015 Punjab Tractors Ltd. SAS, Nagar, Mohali v. Commissioner of Income Tax, Patiala and another which we disposed of today in terms of the judgment delivered by us today in Income Tax Appeal No. 458 of 2015 Punjab Tractors Ltd. SAS, Nagar, Mohali v. Commissioner of Income Tax, Patiala and another.
Accordingly this appeal is disposed of in the same terms as ITA No. 458 of 2015, ITA No. 456 of 2015 and ITA No. 461 of 2015. The assessee shall be entitled to raise the issues in this appeal before the Assessing Officer while computing the amount under Rule 8D.
(S.J.VAZIFDAR)
CHIEF JUSTICE
03.02.2017 ravinder sharma
(DEEPAK SIBAL) JUDGE
NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking√ Whether reportable: No√
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.