Purva Kiran Nayak v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 2 (1), Thane
High Court
17 Jul 2023 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Purva Kiran Nayak v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 2 (1), Thane
Date of order
17 Jul 2023
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Purva Kiran Nayak v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 2 (1), Thane, the High Court (2023) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1332 OF 2023
Sachin Suresh Ghadge....PETITIONERV/SIncome Tax Officer, Circle 22(1)....RESPONDENT
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 2726 OF 2023
Purva Kiran Nayak
....PETITIONER
V/S
Income Tax Officer, Ward 2 (1), Thane....RESPONDENT
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 1333 OF 2023
Ashish Yogendra Kumar Upadhyay....PETITIONERV/SIncome Tax Officer, Ward 41 (2) (1),....RESPONDENT
WITH
WRIT PETITION LODGING NO. 6475 OF 2023
Chandrahas Vithal Shetty
....PETITIONER
V/S
Principal Commissioner Income Tax 42 Ors ....RESPONDENT
WITH
WRIT PETITION LODGING NO. 6518 OF 2023
Anand Vijay Ved
V/S
Income Tax Officer,ward 27 (1) (1)
....PETITIONER
....RESPONDENT
WITH
WRIT PETITION LODGING NO. 7923 OF 2023
Bhaskar Dutta
....PETITIONER
V/S
Income Tax Officer, Ward 41 3 1, Mumbai....RESPONDENT
Ms Manini Bharati a/w Mr Suyash More i/b Mr Rahul Somanfor Petitioner.
Mr Akhileshwar Sharma for Respondent No 1 inWP/1332/2023.
Ms Sushma Nagaraj for Respondent No 1 in WP/1333/2023 a/wWP(L)/6475/2023 and WP(L)/7923/2023.Mr Ajeet Manwani a/w Ms Samiksha Kanani for RespondentNo. 1 in WP(L)/6760/2023.
CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE K.R. SHRIRAM &HON'BLE JUSTICE DR. NEELA KEDARGOKHALE, JJDATE : 4th October, 2023
P.C. :
No orders.
( ASSOCIATE )
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.