Pushpa Kumari, Wife Of Dr. Anirudh Kumar v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Muzaffarpur
High Court
04 May 2010 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · patnahcucisdb94
Parties
Pushpa Kumari, Wife Of Dr. Anirudh Kumar v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Muzaffarpur
Date of order
04 May 2010
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Pushpa Kumari, Wife Of Dr. Anirudh Kumar v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Muzaffarpur, the High Court (2010) decided the matter.
Decision: We accordingly dismiss the writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to pursue his remedy/remedies under the Act.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CWJC No.1010 of 2007
Pushpa Kumari, wife of Dr. Anirudh Kumar, aged about 44 years, resident of N.H. 28, Bhagwanpur, P.O. and P.S.Sadar, in the town and district of Muzaffarpur
---- Petitioner
Versus
1.The Union of India through the Secretary, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Government of India, Central Secretariat, North Block, New Delhi- 110001. Ministry of Finance, Government of India, Central Secretariat, North Block, New Delhi- 110001.
2.Commissioner of Income Tax, Muzaffarpur
3.Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 2, Muzaffarpur
4.Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 2, Muzaffarpur.
---- Respondents.
-----------
Heard Mr. Vikash Jain for the petitioner, and Mr. Harshwardhan Prasad for the respondents. The petitioner has
11. 04.05.2010
approached this Court against the order of the learned Assessing
officer. Instead of pursuing his statutory remedy of appeal, the petitioner has rushed to this Court. We disapprove of such a course of action.
2. We accordingly dismiss the writ petition with
liberty to the petitioner to pursue his remedy/remedies under the Act. If the petitioner prefers statutory appeal within a period of four weeks from today, the same shall be disposed of on merits, and the delay in filing the appeal shall not come in his way. We
make it clear that this Court did not apply its mind to the merits of the case.
(S.K.Katriar,J)
Sym
( Kishore K. Mandal, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.