Pustikar Laghu Vyaparik Pratishhan Bachat Evam Sakh Sahkarisimiti Ltd., Jodhpur v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Jodhpur
High Court
02 Aug 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · rhcjodh240618
Parties
Pustikar Laghu Vyaparik Pratishhan Bachat Evam Sakh Sahkarisimiti Ltd., Jodhpur v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Jodhpur
Date of order
02 Aug 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Pustikar Laghu Vyaparik Pratishhan Bachat Evam Sakh Sahkarisimiti Ltd., Jodhpur v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Jodhpur, the High Court (2024) allowed the appeal under Section 80P of the Income-tax Act. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3022/2012
Pustikar Laghu Vyaparik Pratishhan Bachat Evam Sakh SahkariSimiti Ltd., Jodhpur
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Jodhpur
2. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(5), Jodhpur.
----Respondents
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR
Order
02/08/2024
The Writ Petition has been preferred by the petitioner with
the following prayer :-
“It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that the writpetition filed by the petitioner may kindly be allowed and -(I) The order dated 22-03-12 (Annexure P-8) passed by theCommissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Jodhpur by whichdirection has been given to deposit 50% of the demand note maybe quashed and set aside.(I) The order dated 22-03-12 (Annexure P-8) passed by theCommissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Jodhpur by whichdirection has been given to deposit 50% of the demand note maybe quashed and set aside.
(II) The assessment order dated 21.2.11 (Annexure P-4) may bequashed and set aside.quashed and set aside.
(III) Any other appropriate order or direction which may bedeemed just and proper in the facts and circumstances of thecase may also be passed in favour of the petitioner.”deemed just and proper in the facts and circumstances of thecase may also be passed in favour of the petitioner.”
2.Learned counsel for the parties jointly submitted that during
pendency of the present writ petition, the Commissioner ofIncome Tax (Appeals)-1 vide its order dated 18[th] March 2015passed in Appeal No.397/2011-2012 has set aside the order of theAssessing Authority and directed the Assessing Authority to allow
deduction to the petitioner under section 80P of the Act, therefore,the Writ Petition has rendered infructuous.
In view of the aforesaid submission made at Bar by learnedcounsel for the parties, D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3022/2012 isdismissed as having become infructuous.
(KULDEEP MATHUR),J
(SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR),J
34-AjaySingh/-
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.