Case LawHigh Court › Pvt Ltd. Mumbai v. Asstt. Commissioner O...

Pvt Ltd. Mumbai v. Asstt. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

High Court 20 Oct 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Pvt Ltd. Mumbai v. Asstt. Commissioner Of Income-Tax
Date of order
20 Oct 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Pvt Ltd. Mumbai v. Asstt. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The appeal is allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL No. 1099 OF 2008. INCOME TAX APPEAL No. 1099 OF 2008. M/s Rupee Finance & Management Pvt Ltd. Mumbai .. Appellant. Vs. Asstt. Commissioner of Income-tax, Mumbai ..Respondent. Mr K. Shivram a/w Mr Paras Savla, Advocate for the Appellant. Mr Suresh Kumar, Advocate for the Respondent. CORAM: Dr.S. RADHAKRISHNAN CORAM: Dr.S. RADHAKRISHNAN AND V.C.DAGA, JJ. AND V.C.DAGA, JJ. DATED: 20th OCTOBER, 2008. DATED: 20th OCTOBER, 2008. P.C.: P.C.:---- ---- 1. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the learned counsel for the respondent. 2. The learned counsel for the appellant seeks leave to withdraw the above appeal. The appeal is allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such. 3. Proper court fee be refunded in the above appeal as per rules.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan