Pvt. Ltd v. Income Tax Officer Ward 18(4

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 6. + W.P.(C) 11216/2015 NORTHERN INDIA MACHINERY STORES PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr Keshav Rai with Mr Mukesh Gupta, Advocates. versus INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 18(4) ..... Respondent Through: Mr Ashok K. Manchanda, Senior Standing Counsel with Ms Vibhooti Malhotra, Junior Standing Counsel. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R% 08.02.2016 1. It is pointed out by Mr Ashok Manchanda, learned counsel appearing for the Respondent states that in light of the proviso to the Section 244A(1)(a), since the amount of refund is less than 10 percent of the tax as determined on regular assessment then no interest is payable. 2. There is no dispute that in the present case the above proviso is applicable. In the circumstances, no further orders are called for. 3. The writ petition is disposed of in the above terms. S. MURALIDHAR, J FEBRUARY 08, 2016 MK VIBHU BAKHRU, J