Case LawHigh Court › Pvt. Ltd v. The Assistant Commissioner O...

Pvt. Ltd v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income

High Court 14 Feb 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcbgoa
Parties
Pvt. Ltd v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income
Date of order
14 Feb 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Pvt. Ltd v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1 mca171-19-14-02-19 Santosh IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.171 OF 2019IN WRIT PETITION NO.178 OF 2015 Sociedade de Fomento Industrial Pvt. Ltd. ….. Applicant. Versus The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax and others. …... Respondents. Mr. S. S. Kantak, Senior Advocate with Ms. Swati S. Kamat Wagh, Advocate for the Applicant. Ms. Susan Linhares, Junior Central Govt. Standing Counsel for the Respondents. Coram : M.S. Sonak & Prithviraj K. Chavan, JJ. Date : 14 February 2019. P.C.: 1. The learned Counsel for the parties state that they have noobjection to this Bench taking up this Application. 2. Heard Mr. S.S. Kantak, learned Senior Advocate, with Ms. Swati Kamat Wagh for the Applicant and Ms. Susan Linhares, learned Standing Counsel for the Respondents. 3. By this Civil Application, the Applicant seeks the following 2 mca171-19-14-02-19 reliefs : “a) This Hon'ble Court be pleased to modify the Orderdated 08.05.2015, by relieving the Applicant from theobligation of furnishing any Bank Guarantee from the dateof this application, in respect of reassessment proceedingsfor AYs 2008-09 to 2011-12; b) In the alternative, this Hon'ble Court be pleased topermit the Applicant to furnish Bank Guarantee of anyScheduled Bank instead of a Nationalized Bank by orderingthat the word “Nationalized” in para 9 of the Order dated08.05.2015 be replaced and substituted by the word“Scheduled”; c) Pass such other and further Orders, as this Hon'bleCourt deems fit and proper”. 4.Mr. Kantak, learned Senior Advocate for the Applicants, onthe basis of the instructions, makes a statement that the Applicants donot press the relief in terms of prayer clause (a), at this stage. 5.In so far as the relief in terms of prayer clause (b) isconcerned, Ms. Linhares, learned Standing Counsel, on the basis ofthe instructions, states that she has no objection if the same isgranted. 6.Mr Kantak, learned Senior Advocate for the Applicantstates that the Applicants will furnish Bank Guarantee from ICICIBank. 3 mca171-19-14-02-19 7.Accordingly, this Misc. Civil Application is made absolutein terms of prayer clause (b) as aforesaid. The Applicants arepermitted to furnish the Bank Guarantee from ICICI Bank, which isstated to be a Scheduled Bank. 8. The Misc. Civil Application is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. (Prithviraj K. Chavan, J.) (M.S. Sonak, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan