Case LawHigh Court › Qualcomm Technologies, Inc v. Deputy Com...

Qualcomm Technologies, Inc v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle International Tax 3-1-1 & Ors

High Court 09 Feb 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle International Tax 3-1-1 & Ors
Date of order
09 Feb 2022
Assessment year(s)
2019-20
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Qualcomm Technologies, Inc v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle International Tax 3-1-1 & Ors, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

$~33 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2156/2022 QUALCOMM TECHNOLOGIES, INC ..... Petitioner Through Ms.Ananya Kapoor, Advocate. versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE INTERNATIONAL TAX 3-1-1 & ORS. ..... Respondents Through Mr.Puneet Rai, Advocate. Date of Decision: 09[th] February, 2022 % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHANHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA J U D G M E N T MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) C.M.No.6177/2022 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Accordingly, the applications stand disposed of. W.P.(C) No.2156/2022 1.The petition has been heard by way of video conferencing. 2.Present writ petition has been filed seeking directions to the respondents to process the return of income, issue correct computation as well as issue refund along with up-to-date interest for the assessment year 2019-20. 3.Learned counsel for the petitioner states that no scrutiny assessment NEUTRAL CITATION NO: 2022/DHC/000520 was undertaken for the year under consideration. She states that the petitioner’s return of income has been processed under Section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’). She, however, states that an intimation under Section 245 of the Act was issued by the respondents to adjust the said refund against erroneous demand raised for the assessment years 2013-14 and 2017-18. She further states that the said erroneous demand has now been deleted. She lastly states that the petitioner has filed a rectification application dated 04[th] February, 2022, which is pending consideration before the Assessing Officer. 4.Issue notice. Mr.Puneet Rai, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 5.Keeping in view the limited prayer made in the present writ petition, the same is disposed of with a direction to the Assessing Officer to decide the petitioner’s rectification application dated 04[th] February, 2022 for the assessment year 2019-20 in accordance with law within six months. FEBRUARY 09, 2022 KA MANMOHAN, J NAVIN CHAWLA, J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan