R By Sri.k.m.v.pandalai, Income Tax Department R1,2 By Government Pleader, Sri. Liju v. Stephen
High Court
26 Apr 2016 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
R By Sri.k.m.v.pandalai, Income Tax Department R1,2 By Government Pleader, Sri. Liju v. Stephen
Date of order
26 Apr 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In R By Sri.k.m.v.pandalai, Income Tax Department R1,2 By Government Pleader, Sri. Liju v. Stephen, the High Court (2016) allowed the appeal under Section 194 of the Income-tax Act. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
TUESDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF APRIL 2016/6TH VAISAKHA, 1938
WP(C).No. 15846 of 2016 (E)
----------------------------
PETITIONER(S):-------------
P.J.SEBASTIAN, AGED 68 YEARSS/O. JOSEPH, PANACHIKAVAYALIL HOUSEAZAD ROAD, KALOOR, KOCHI - 17
BY ADVS.SRI.S.K.AJAY KUMAR SMT.PRIYA. H.
RESPONDENT(S):
--------------
1.THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,
CIVIL STATION, KAKKANAD, ERNAKULA,-682 030
2.THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR, L.A.KOCHI, OFFICE OF THE KOCHI CORPORATIONKOCHI, OFFICE OF THE KOCHI CORPORATION
VYTTILA - 682 014
3.THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, IS PRESS ROAD, KOCHI - 682 018
R BY SRI.K.M.V.PANDALAI, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT R1,2 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SRI. LIJU V. STEPHEN
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26-04-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:-
-----------------------
P1COPY OF THE SALE DEED No.5690 OF 1993 DATED 29.12.1993 OF ERNAKULAM SROERNAKULAM SRO
P2COPY OF THE NOTICE BEARING No.C-338/10 DATED 11.04.2016 ISSUED BY THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LA), KOCHI, COCHIN CORPORATION, VYTTILA.BY THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LA), KOCHI, COCHIN CORPORATION, VYTTILA.
P3COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 01.10.2013 IN WP(C)NO.24103/2013 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT. THIS HON'BLE COURT.
P4COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 05.02.2015 IN WP(C) 3622/2015 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT. THIS HON'BLE COURT.
RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:-------------------------NIL
// True copy //PA to Judge
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.
===========================================
W.P.(C). No. 15846 of 2016
=====================================================
Dated this the 26[th] day of April, 2016
JUDGMENT
The petitioner in the writ petition seek a direction to therespondents not to deduct tax at source under Section 194 LA ofthe Income Tax act while making payments of the compensationamounts due to him in respect of the lands acquired by therespondents. The right of the petitioner to receive thecompensation amounts, without having any deductions effectedtherefrom in terms of Section 194 LA of the IT Act, has alreadybeen decided in his favour by a judgment of this Court in W.P.(C)No.5607/2014. Accordingly, the present writ petition is allowed bydeclaring that the revenue authorities shall not deduct any tax atsource under Section 194 LA, from compensation amounts payableto the petitioners. It is made clear however that the deductionunder Section 194 IA, wherever applicable, can be effected by therevenue authorities.
das /26.04.2016
Sd/-A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.