R. Natesans/O. Rangasamy v. The Income Tax Officer,Ward-5
High Court
06 Mar 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
R. Natesans/O. Rangasamy v. The Income Tax Officer,Ward-5
Date of order
06 Mar 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In R. Natesans/O. Rangasamy v. The Income Tax Officer,Ward-5, the High Court (2025) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
CRL O.P. No.6250 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 25.03.2025
CORAM:
THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN
CRL O.P. No.6250 of 2025
R. NatesanS/o. Rangasamy, No.4/9, Kokkalai Post,Neikaramovalam, Periyamanali,Namakkal
Petitioner(s)
Vs
The Income Tax Officer,WARD-5, No. 138/3, KMR ShoppingArcade, Salem Main Road, Namakkal -637 001.
Respondent(s)
For Petitioner(s): R VivekananthanFor Respondent: K.S. Sri Giri Prasath,Special Public Prosecutor forIncome Tax
ORDER
This petition has been filed under the caption 'for being
mentioned' today.
SUNDER MOHAN. J
1/2
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL O.P. No.6250 of 2025
mjs
2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.
3. Considering the reasons stated by the petitioner that there is a
typographical error in the order dated 06.03.2025 in CRL O.P. No.6250
of 2025 in page no.3, copy is marked to '2. The Judicial Magistrate,
Namakkal', instead of 'The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Namakkal'. The above said correction has to be carried out accordingly.
4. The Registry is directed to issue a fresh order copy after carrying out necessary corrections.
25.03.2025
mjs
CRL O.P. No.6250 of 2025
2/2
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.