Case LawHigh Court › R. Rathinam v. Https://Www.mhc.tn.gov.in...

R. Rathinam v. Https://Www.mhc.tn.gov.in/Judis

High Court 23 Aug 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
R. Rathinam v. Https://Www.mhc.tn.gov.in/Judis
Date of order
23 Aug 2022
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In R. Rathinam v. Https://Www.mhc.tn.gov.in/Judis, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Crl.O.P. (MD) No.20641 of 2014 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT RESERVED ON14.09.2022DELIVERED ON28.09.2022 CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P.N. PRAKASH Crl.O.P. (MD) No.20641 of 2014 & M.P. (MD) No.1 of 2014 1S.K. Rengasamy 2R. Mathivanan 3R. Vijayakumar 4Kavithakala 5Vidhyapriya 6R. Jeyabharathi 7Thirupathi Chettiar 8T. Veera Raj 9T. Ramamoorthy 10K. Annamalai Chettiar 11S. Sivanantham 12R. Rathinam vs. Petitioners 1/4 Crl.O.P. (MD) No.20641 of 2014 1 State represented by itsInspector of PoliceCity Crime BranchTrichy CityTrichy(Cr. No.28 of 2014) 2M. Ganesan Respondents Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking to call for the records in Cr.No.28 of 2014 on the file of the first respondent police and quash the same. For petitioners Mr. S. Sakthivelfor Mr. S.P. Venkatasubramanian For R2Mr. R. MuniyapparajAddl. Public Prosecutor- - - - - ORDER Originally, this petition was filed in the Madurai Bench as the occurrence took place in Trichy. However, at the request of the learned counsel on either side, the matter was transferred to the file of the Principal Seat and was directed to be clubbed along with Crl.O.P. (MD) No.3487 of 2015 to be heard together. 2Heard both sides. 2/4 Crl.O.P. (MD) No.20641 of 2014 3 This petition has been filed seeking to quash the FIR in Cr.No.28 of 2014 on the file of the first respondent police. 4When the mater was taken up for hearing, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the investigation in Cr.No.28 of 2014 was completed and charge sheet was filed in C.C. No.164 of 2018 in the Court of the Judicial Magsitrate No.II, Trichy and thereafter, the same has been transferred to the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court No.I, Trichy and renumbered as C.C. No.188 of 2022 for the offences under Sections 120-B, 420, 506(II) and 406 IPC @ Sections 120-B, 420 read with 109 IPC against 9 accused, viz., Rengasamy, Mathivanan, Vijayakumar, Kavithakala, Vidhyapriya, Jeyabharathi, Thirupathi Chettiar, Veera Raj and Ramamoorthy. 5Since investigation has been completed and charge sheet filed, nothing survives for adjudication in this petition for quashing the FIR. Hence, this petition is closed with liberty to the petitioners to work out their remedies in the manner known to law. Connected M.P. stands closed. cad .09.2022 3/4 To 1The Inspector of PoliceCity Crime BranchTrichy CityTrichy 2The Public ProsecutorMadras High CourtChennai 600 104Madras High CourtChennai 600 104 3The Judicial Magistrate No.ITrichy(C.C. No.188 of 2022)Trichy(C.C. No.188 of 2022) 4/4 Crl.O.P. (MD) No.20641 of 2014 P.N. PRAKASH, J. cad Crl.O.P. (MD) No.20641 of 2014 28.09.2022
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan