Case LawHigh Court › R. Vallabhdas & Co v. Commissioner Of In...

R. Vallabhdas & Co v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

High Court 23 Feb 2004 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
R. Vallabhdas & Co v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax
Date of order
23 Feb 2004
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In R. Vallabhdas & Co v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, the High Court (2004) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- R.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 98 of 1992 For Approval and Signature: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH and HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the concerned : NO Magistrate/Magistrates,Judge/Judges,Tribunal/Tribunals? -------------------------------------------------------------- R. VALLABHDAS & CO. Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. INCOME TAX REFERENCE No. 98 of 1992 MR RK PATEL for Petitioner No. 1 MR MANISH R BHATT for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH and HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.C.PATEL Date of decision: 23/02/2004 ORAL JUDGEMENT (Per : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH) �In this reference made at the instance of the assessee, Mr RK Patel, learned counsel appears for the applicant-assessee and Mr Manish R Bhatt, learned standing counsel appears for the revenue. �Mr RK Patel for the applicant-assessee states, under instructions, that the assessee does not wish to press this reference. �In view of the above, we decline to answer the question referred for our opinion. �The reference accordingly stands disposed of. �����(M.S. SHAH, J.) �����(M.C. PATEL, J.) zgs/-
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan