Radha Kalro … v. The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax And Anr. …
High Court
06 May 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcbgoa
Parties
Radha Kalro … v. The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax And Anr. …
Date of order
06 May 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Radha Kalro … v. The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax And Anr. …, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.
Issue: Razaq, learned counsel for the Respondents states thatshe will have to verify the position as to whether the payments haveactually made.
Decision: Accordingly, this petition is permitted tobe withdrawn and is disposed of as such.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
WRIT PETITION NO.440 OF 2014
RADHA KALRO…Petitioner VSTHE CHIEF COMMISSIONEROF INCOME TAX AND ANR.…Respondents
Mr. R. G. Rivankar, Advocate for the Petitioner. Ms. Amira Razaq, Advocate for the Respondents.
Coram:- M. S. SONAK & SMT. M. S. JAWALKAR, JJ.Date : 6[th] May 2021
P.C.
Heard Mr. R. Rivankar, learned counsel for the Petitionerand Ms. A. Razaq, learned counsel for the Respondents.
2.Mr. Rivankar, on instructions, from the Petitioner seeksleave to withdraw this petition since, the Petitioner, has already paid thedemanded amount under Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 and the rulesmade thereunder.
3.Ms. Razaq, learned counsel for the Respondents states thatshe will have to verify the position as to whether the payments haveactually made.
4.According to us, since, the Petitioner makes a solemnstatement that such amounts have already been paid and only wishes towithdraw this petition, we see no difficulty in granting the Petitionerleave to withdraw this petition. Accordingly, this petition is permitted tobe withdrawn and is disposed of as such.
SMT. M.S. JAWALKAR, J.
M.S. SONAK, J.
at*TARI AMRUT Digitally signed by TARI AMRUT NAGESH NAGESHDate: 2021.05.07 10:50:25 +05'30'
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue