Case LawHigh Court › Radhaballabh Silk Mills P. Ltd v. The Dy...

Radhaballabh Silk Mills P. Ltd v. The Dy. Commissioner Of

High Court 10 Dec 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Radhaballabh Silk Mills P. Ltd v. The Dy. Commissioner Of
Date of order
10 Dec 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Remanded

Case summary

In Radhaballabh Silk Mills P. Ltd v. The Dy. Commissioner Of, the High Court (2008) remanded the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY VPH ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL No. 245 OF 2006 Radhaballabh Silk Mills P. Ltd. Appellant Vs The Dy. Commissioner of ... Respondent Income-Tax, Circle-4(1), Mumbai Mr. S. G. Dalal, for the appellant. Mr. Vimal Gupta, for the respondent. CORAM: Dr. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, & V. C. DAGA, JJ. DATED: DECEMBER 10, 2008. P.C.: ---- . Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the learned counsel for the respondent. After hearing the parties for some time, by the consent of both the parties, the impugned order dated 16th January, 2006 passed by the Tribunal is modifed to the limited extent that instead of remanding back to the lower Appellate Authority, the matter is remanded back to the Assessing Officer, so as to enable the appellant to raise all the contentions before the AO. In view thereof the impugned order dated 16th January, 2006 is modified, as mentioned above. All contentions of the appellant are kept expressly open. - 2 - 2. Both the learned counsel agree that there is no need to record the reasons, in view of the limited order that has been passed. Sd/- Sd/- [ V.C. DAGA, J.] [ Dr. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.]
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan