Radhagobind Commercial Limited v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 11(1), Kolkata & Ors
High Court
05 Sep 2023 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_appellate_side
Parties
Radhagobind Commercial Limited v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 11(1), Kolkata & Ors
Date of order
05 Sep 2023
Assessment year(s)
2017-18
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Radhagobind Commercial Limited v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 11(1), Kolkata & Ors, the High Court (2023) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
5.9.2023 ks sl. 9
ks WPA 20457 of 2023
Radhagobind Commercial Limited
VsIncome Tax Officer, Ward 11(1), Kolkata & Ors.
Mr. Abhratosh Majumder, Ld. Sr. Adv.,Mr. Avra Mazumder,Mr. Kausheyo Roy,Mr. Samrat Das
… For the Petitioner.
Mr. Aryak Dutt … For the Respondent No.1.
Heard learned Advocates appearing for the parties. By this writ petition, petitioner has challenged theimpugned assessment order dated 29[th] May, 2023,under Section 147 read with Section 144B of theIncome Tax Act, 1961 relating to the assessment year2017-18. On perusal of the aforesaid impugnedassessment order I find no reason to entertain thiswrit petition firstly on the ground of availability ofalternative remedy by way of statutory appeal andsecondly I find that the aforesaid impugned order isneither without jurisdiction nor having passed by anauthority having inherent lack of jurisdiction nor inviolation of principles of natural justice. However, onthe ground of availability of alternative remedy by wayof statutory appeal, though the time to file appealagainst the impugned assessment order has expired,in the interest of justice, time to file statutory appealagainst the aforesaid impugned assessment order is
extended by 15 days from date and if such appeal isfiled by the petitioner within the time stipulatedherein, the Appellate Authority concerned shallconsider and dispose of such appeal to be filed by thepetitioner, on merits, by not raising the point oflimitation.
It is clarified that this writ petition has not beenentertained on the ground of availability of alternativeremedy without going into the merits of the impugnedassessment order and petitioner will be free to urge allthe points on merits of the impugned assessmentorder before the Appellate Authority.
With this observation and direction this writpetition being WPA 20457 of 2023 is disposed of.
( Md. Nizamuddin, J. )
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.