Radhey Shyam Meena v. Union Of India

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH ATJAIPURD.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7196 / 2010 Radhey Shyam Meena S/o Late Shri Nanu Ram Meena, aged about30 years, resident of A-383, Bai Ji Ki Kothi, Jhalana Doongri,Jaipur (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus 1. Union Of India through the Secretary to the Government ofIndia, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, New Delhi.2. Director General of Income Tax (Investigation) N.C.R. Building,Statue Circle, Jaipur. 3. Director of Income Tax, C.I.B. (Central Information Branch),N.C.R. Building Statue Circle, Jaipur. 4. Central Administrative Tribunal through its Registrar, JaipurBench, Jaipur. ----Respondent _____________________________________________________ For Appellant(s) : Sh. Neeraj Sharma Adv.For Respondent(s) : Sh. R.B. Mathur Adv. _____________________________________________________ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGIHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH CHANDRA SOMANI 10/05/2017 Order Both the counsel jointly submits that the self same questionwhich has been raised in the instant petition, came to beexamined & decided by this Court in D.B. Civil Writ PetitionNo.5566/2010 (Laxminarain Meena Vs. Union of India & Ors.) &other connected petitions, vide judgment dt.21-7-2015. This Court in the judgment (supra) observed as under :- “Since the question has already been examinedand decided by a Coordinate Division Bench ofthis court, no more lis is res integra to beexamined and keeping in view the order of theDivision Bench referred to we consider itappropriate to dispose of the instant batch of writpetitions accordingly, and all these writpetitioners are entitled to the same relief, mutatismutandis, as granted by the Division Bench in itsjudgment dated 19.3.2015.” In view of the joint statement made by both the counsel, the present writ petition in the light of the terms mutatis mutandisreferred to in the judgment (supra), stands disposed of. (DINESH CHANDRA SOMANI),J. (AJAY RASTOGI),J. Shekhawatvs/1