Case Law › High Court › Radhika Roy v. Pr.commissioner Of Income...

Radhika Roy v. Pr.commissioner Of Income Tax- 6 & Anr. Anr

High Court 10 Jan 2025 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · dhcdb

Parties

Date of order

10 Jan 2025

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Radhika Roy v. Pr.commissioner Of Income Tax- 6 & Anr. Anr, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

$~16 to 21 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA 582/2019 & CM APPL.1209/2025 (Withdrawal Of Appeal) RADHIKA ROY .....Appellant Through: Ms. Disha Jham and Mr. Devansh Jain, Advs. Devansh Jain, Advs. versus PR.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX- 6 & ANR. ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Induraj Singh Rai, SSC with Mr. Sanjeev Menon, JSC, Mr. Rahul Singh, JSC, Mr. Anmol Jagga and Mr.Gaurav Kumar, Advs. 17 + ITA 583/2019 & CM APPL.1207/2025 (Withdrawal Of Appeal) Appeal) RADHIKA ROY .....Appellant Through: Ms. Disha Jham and Mr. Devansh Jain, Advs. versus PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX- 6 & ANR. .....Respondents Ms. Induraj Singh Rai, SSC with Mr. Sanjeev Menon, JSC, Mr. Rahul Singh, JSC, Mr. Anmol Jagga and Mr.Gaurav Kumar, Advs. Through: 18 + ITA 584/2019, CM APPL. 47926/2019 (Stay) & CM APPL.1210/2025 (Withdrawal Of Appeal) PRANNOY ROY .....Appellant Through: Ms. Disha Jham and Mr. Devansh Jain, Advs. versus PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 6 & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Induraj Singh Rai, SSC with Mr. Sanjeev Menon, JSC, Mr. Rahul Singh, JSC, Mr. Anmol Jagga and Mr.Gaurav Kumar, Advs. 19 + ITA 585/2019 & CM APPL.1208/2025 (Withdrawal Of Appeal) PRANNOY ROY .....Appellant Through: Ms. Disha Jham and Mr. Devansh Jain, Advs. versus PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX- 6 & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Induraj Singh Rai, SSC with Mr. Sanjeev Menon, JSC, Mr. Rahul Singh, JSC, Mr. Anmol Jagga and Mr.Gaurav Kumar, Advs. 20 + ITA 623/2019 & CM APPL.1204/2025 (Withdrawal Of Appeal) RADHIKA ROY .....Appellant Through: Ms. Disha Jham and Mr. Devansh Jain, Advs. versus PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX- 6 & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Induraj Singh Rai, SSC with Mr. Sanjeev Menon, JSC, Mr. Rahul Singh, JSC, Mr. Anmol Jagga and Mr.Gaurav Kumar, Advs. 21 + ITA 626/2019 & CM APPL.1211/2025 (Withdrawal Of % Appeal) PRANNOY ROY .....Appellant Through: Ms. Disha Jham and Mr. Devansh Jain, Advs. versus PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX- 6, & ANR. .....Respondents Ms. Induraj Singh Rai, SSC with Mr. Sanjeev Menon, JSC, Mr. Rahul Singh, JSC, Mr. Anmol Jagga and Mr.Gaurav Kumar, Advs. Through: CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR O R D E R10.01.2025 Learned counsel for the appellants states that since they have applied for settlement under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024, the appeals may be dismissed at this stage as not pressed. Ordered accordingly. The aforesaid, however, shall be with liberty reserved to the appellants to seek revival in case the settlement is not accepted under the aforesaid Act. YASHWANT VARMA, J. HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J. JANUARY 10, 2025/nd

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.