Rafeeq Enterprises,Rep. By Its v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
21 Aug 2025 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · mdubench
Parties
Rafeeq Enterprises,Rep. By Its v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
21 Aug 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Rafeeq Enterprises,Rep. By Its v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 21.08.2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN
W.P(MD)No.22788 of 2025
andW.M.P(MD)Nos.17874 and 17876 of 2025
Rafeeq Enterprises,Rep. by its Partner,Jasmine Hamila,6, 1[st] Floor Kaluvettri Lane Street,Tirunelveli Town,Tirunelveli District.
... Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Commissioner of Income Tax,
Office of the Commissioner of Income Tax, Tirunelveli District.
2.The Income Tax Officer,
Office of the Income Tax Officer,
Ward 4, Tirunelveli District.
...Respondents
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned demand notice issued by the second respondent in his proceedings DIN ITBA/RCV/F/17/2025-2026/1076257339(1) dated 16.05.2025 under Section 144 r/w Section 147 for an outstanding demand of
1/4
W.P(MD)No.22788 of 2025
Rs.7,71,01,000/- for the assessment year 2020 - 2021 and quash the same as illegal and consequentially to direct the Respondents to re-assess the income tax after providing an opportunity of hearing to the Petitioner qua the PAN No within the period that may be stipulated by this Court.
For Petitioner : Mr.P.Mohammed Suhail
For M/s.Ajmal Associates
For Respondent
: Mr.T.Parekh Kumar
ORDER
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned cousnel for the respondents.
2. The petitioner has challenged the impugned recovery notice asking the petitioner to pay a sum of Rs.7,71,01,000/-.
3. However, it is noticed that the petitioner has earlier suffered an assessment order, dated 20.02.2025 for the assessment year 2020, which has not been challenged by the petitioner. Therefore, the writ petition challenging the impugned recovery notice dated 16.05.2025 is without any merits. That apart, 2/4
W.P(MD)No.22788 of 2025
the petitioner has an alternate remedy against the aforesaid assessment order, dated 20.02.2025.
4. Under these circumstances, the writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to work out the remedy under Section 246 A read with Section 249(3) of the Income Tax Act before the appellate Commissioner. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
21.08.2025
To
1.The Commissioner of Income Tax,
Office of the Commissioner of Income Tax, Tirunelveli District.
2.The Income Tax Officer,
Office of the Income Tax Officer, Ward 4, Tirunelveli District.
3/4
4/4
W.P(MD)No.22788 of 2025
C.SARAVANAN, J.sn
W.P(MD)No.22788 of 2025
21.08.2025
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.