In Raghavji Hansraj v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2001) decided the matter.
Issue: Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- RAGHAVJI HANSRAJ Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: SERVED BY RPAD - (N) for Petitioner No.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 106 of 1987
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH Sd/-
and
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA Sd/-
============================================================
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO
to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO
of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO
--------------------------------------------------------------
RAGHAVJI HANSRAJ
Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:
SERVED BY RPAD - (N) for Petitioner No. 1 MR BB NAYAK FOR MR MANISH R BHATT for Respondent No. 1
--------------------------------------------------------------
CORAM : MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH
and
MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA
Date of decision: 25/09/2001
ORAL JUDGEMENT
(Per : MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH)
�This referenc was made at the instance of the
assessee way back in 1987. Though a period of 14 years
has elapsed, the Paper Book is not filed. When this
matter is called out, none appears on behalf of the
assessee.
2�In view of the above, we decline to answer the
questions referred to us.
3�The Reference is accordingly disposed of with no
order as to costs.
���Sd/-��Sd/-
��(M.S.Shah, J)�(D.A.Mehta, J)
m.m.bhatt�
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.