Raghukul Buildtech Llp, B v. Income Tax Ward 1(1), Jaipur Ncr Building, Statue Circle,Jaipurjaipur
High Court
19 Feb 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Raghukul Buildtech Llp, B v. Income Tax Ward 1(1), Jaipur Ncr Building, Statue Circle,Jaipurjaipur
Date of order
19 Feb 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Raghukul Buildtech Llp, B v. Income Tax Ward 1(1), Jaipur Ncr Building, Statue Circle,Jaipurjaipur, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.
Decision: In view of thesubsequent developments, this petition is disposed of with libertyto avail remedies in accordance with law and to raise all issuestaken in this writ.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5884/2023
Raghukul Buildtech Llp, B-5, Power House Road, Sen Colony,Jaipur, Rajasthan 302016 Through Its Partner Shri Nawal KishoreDangayach, S/o Shri Jugal Kishore Dangayach, Aged About 50Years, R/o A-34, Ram Nagar, Shastri Nagar, Jaipur.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Income Tax Ward 1(1), Jaipur Ncr Building, Statue Circle,JaipurJaipur
2. Principal Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jaipur, NcrBuilding, Statue Circle, JaipurBuilding, Statue Circle, Jaipur
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Gunjan PathakFor Respondent(s): Mr. Anuroop Singh withMr. Aditya Khandelwal
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA
Order
19/02/2024
The Court has been informed that during the pendency of thepetition, reassessment order has been passed.
Learned counsel for the respondents submits that returnedincome of the petitioner has been accepted. In view of thesubsequent developments, this petition is disposed of with libertyto avail remedies in accordance with law and to raise all issuestaken in this writ.
(SHUBHA MEHTA),J
(AVNEESH JHINGAN),J
Chandan/Himanshu--353
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.