Rahul Anthony Rodrigues]… v. Assessment Unit, Additional / Joint / Deputy /]Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax & Ors.] …
High Court
26 Oct 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newas
Parties
Rahul Anthony Rodrigues]… v. Assessment Unit, Additional / Joint / Deputy /]Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax & Ors.] …
Date of order
26 Oct 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Rahul Anthony Rodrigues]… v. Assessment Unit, Additional / Joint / Deputy /]Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax & Ors.] …, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
1 476-WP 1217-21.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYCIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.1217 OF 2021
Rahul Anthony Rodrigues]… Petitioner
Versus
Assessment Unit, Additional / Joint / Deputy /]Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax & Ors.] … Respondents
Mr. Tanmay Phadke i/b Mr. Ruturaj H. Gurjar for Petitioner.Mr. Nirmal C. Mohanty for Respondents.
CORAM:- K. R. SHRIRAM &AMIT B. BORKAR, JJ.DATE :- 28OCTOBER, 2021
P. C. :-
1.Both learned Counsel suggest that the impugned AssessmentOrder dated 23/04/2021 be quashed and set aside and remanded back tothe Assessing Officer to pass such order as he deems fit in accordancewith law. Ordered accordingly.
2.Before passing any order, the Assessing Officer shall considerthe reply filed by Petitioner and also shall grant personal hearing toPetitioner in accordance with rules. The order be passed within 6 weeksfrom today.
URS 1 of 2
2 476-WP 1217-21.odt
3.Mr. Phadke places a caveat that this is without prejudice toPetitioner’s Appeal pending before ITAT where Petitioner has challengedthe power exercised by the Commissioner of Income Tax under Section263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
4.
Petition disposed.
(AMIT B. BORKAR, J.)
(K. R. SHRIRAM, J.)
URS 2 of 2
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue