Case LawHigh Court › Rahul Gopal Nigam, Nasik v. Addl. Commis...

Rahul Gopal Nigam, Nasik v. Addl. Commissioner Of Income Tax-2

High Court 22 Jan 2013 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Rahul Gopal Nigam, Nasik v. Addl. Commissioner Of Income Tax-2
Date of order
22 Jan 2013
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Rahul Gopal Nigam, Nasik v. Addl. Commissioner Of Income Tax-2, the High Court (2013) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

ASN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2577 OF 2012 ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1912 OF 2012 Rahul Gopal Nigam, Nasik.v. Addl. Commissioner of Income Tax-2. ..Appellant. ..Respondent. Mr. Atul K. Jasani for the Appellant.Mr. Tejveer Singh for the Respondent. CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND M.S. SANKLECHA, JJ. DATE : 22ND JANUARY, 2013 PC: By consent, notice of motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) and stands disposed of. (M.S.SANKLECHA, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan