Rainbow Ventures Pvt. Ltd v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 8/1, Kolkata & Ors
High Court
15 May 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
Rainbow Ventures Pvt. Ltd v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 8/1, Kolkata & Ors
Date of order
15 May 2025
Assessment year(s)
2014-15
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Rainbow Ventures Pvt. Ltd v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 8/1, Kolkata & Ors, the High Court (2025) decided the matter.
Decision: 6) The instant writ petition is accordingly disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
WPO/204/2025 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE
Rainbow Ventures Pvt. Ltd.
Versus Income Tax Officer, Ward 8/1, Kolkata & Ors.
Before: The Hon’ble Justice RAJA BASU CHOWDHURY Date: 15[th] May 2025
Appearance: Ms. Swapna Das, Advocate Mr. Siddharth Das, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Prithu Dudheria, Advocate for the respondents
The Court:
1)The instant writ petition has been filed inter alia praying for a direction upon the respondents to refund a sum of Rs.3,91,678/- for the assessment year 2014-15 which has been approved by the Principal Commissioner of the Income Tax – 1, Kolkata in favour of M/s. KNS Exports Private Limited, a company which had been amalgamated with the petitioner pursuant to and in terms of the order passed by the National Company Law Tribunal, Kolkata in Company Petition CP(CAA) No. 301/KB/2019 dated 9[th] July 2019 sanctioning the scheme of amalgamation.
2)Learned advocate for the petitioner by drawing attention of this Court to the order dated 9[th] July 2019 would submit that M/s. KNS
Exports Private Limited is referred to in the said scheme so sanctioned by the aforesaid order as the transferor company, while the petitioner is referred to as transferee company. It is submitted that by the aforesaid order the scheme of amalgamation was approved/sanctioned which inter alia, provides that on and from the appointed date i.e. 1[st] April 2018 any refund under the tax laws due to the transferor company consequent to the assessments made on the transferor company for which no credit is taken in the accounts as on the date immediately preceding the appointed date shall also belong to and be received by the transferee company. It is submitted that the Income Tax Officer, Ward – 2(1) Kolkata has since on 8[th] February 2022 passed an assessment order under the (Vivad Se Vishwas Act) whereunder the aforesaid sum of Rs.3,91,678/- has become refundable to the aforesaid KNS Exports Private Limited. The petitioner has duly by a communication dated 22[nd]July 2022 brought the factum of amalgamation with the aforesaid KNS Exports Private Limited to the notice of the Income Tax Officer including the fact that the petitioner has surrendered the PAN of KNS Exports Private Limited.
3) in furtherance to the above, by a communication in writing dated 2[nd] April 2024 the petitioner had also requested the Joint Commissioner of Income Tax to credit the refund payable to M/s. KNS Exports Private Limited upon its amalgamation, in favour of the petitioner. According to the petitioner, despite the aforesaid representations no steps have been taken by the respondents.
4) Mr. Dudheria, learned advocate appears on behalf of the respondents.
5) Having heard the learned advocates representing the respective parties and noting that the scheme of amalgamation has been sanctioned by National Company Law Tribunal, Kolkata Bench in CP(CAA) No. 301/KB/2019 dated 9[th] July 2019 whereunder the said KNS Exports Private Limited stood amalgamated with the petitioner on and from the appointed date being 1[st] April 2018, and having regard to the terms of the scheme, I am of the view that if the refund has already not been effected in favour of KNS Exports Private Limited, appropriate steps should be taken by the respondents to process the petitioner’s representation and effectuate the refund in favour of the petitioner. A decision in this regard must be taken by the respondents upon giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of communication of this order.
6) The instant writ petition is accordingly disposed of.
7) There shall be no order as to costs.
(RAJA BASU CHOWDHURY, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.