In Raj Arjanbhai Ahir v. Income Tax Officer Ward 3(3)(1, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4592 of 2022
=============================================RAJ ARJANBHAI AHIR
Versus
INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 3(3)(1)
=============================================
Appearance:
DARSHAN R PATEL(8486) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1 for the Respondent(s) No. 1
=============================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALAand
HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE NISHA M. THAKORE
Date : 07/03/2022
ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA)
Mr. Darshan R. Patel, the learned counsel appearing forthe writ applicant does not press this application.
Accordingly, the present writ application stands disposedof as not pressed.
(J. B. PARDIWALA, J)
(NISHA M. THAKORE,J)
NEHA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue