Raj Kumar Pruthi v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panchkula And Others
High Court
18 Jan 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Raj Kumar Pruthi v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panchkula And Others
Date of order
18 Jan 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Raj Kumar Pruthi v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panchkula And Others, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
--CM77972017 &--CM186702017 in--CWP11972016 (O&M)
-Date of decision: 18.01.2018
Raj Kumar Pruthi
Versus
...Petitioner
Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Panchkula and others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.J. VAZIFDAR, CHIEF JUSTICEHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN
Present:- Mr. Aman Bansal, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Yogesh Putney, Advocate, for the respondents.
* * * *
S.J. VAZIFDAR, C.J. (ORAL)
The application for withdrawal of the petition is
allowed.
2. The petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
(S.J. VAZIFDAR)
CHIEF JUSTICE
(AVNEESH JHINGAN)
JUDGE
18.01.2018
Amodh
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue